Page summary

https://www.siarv.it/

Tested 2026-10-17 16:21:42 using Chrome 154.0.8037.57 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPUThird partyLighthouse

This page is fast to paint, snappy to interact with and visually stable, but loose on best practices and weak on user privacy.

65 / 100
Coach overall
68 / 100
Performance
81 / 100
Best practice
54 / 100
Privacy

How it loaded →

0 → 2.833 s · median run
Frame at 0 ms
start
Frame at 700 ms
700 ms
Frame at 1300 ms
1.300 s
Frame at 1800 ms
Largest paint1.800 s
Frame at 2400 ms
2.400 s
Frame at 2900 ms
Complete2.900 s
433 ms
First Visual Change
1.358 s
Speed Index
1.900 s
Visual Complete 85%
2.833 s
Last Visual Change
TTFB49 msLCP1.416 sTBT106 msCLS0.01

What to act on · top recommendations

Avoid using Google Tag Manager.

0 / 100

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Avoid CPU Long Tasks

0 / 100

The page has 6 CPU long tasks with the total of 416 ms. The total blocking time is 96 ms and 2 long tasks before first contentful paint with total time of 120 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)

0 / 100

The page ships 22 images (out of 22) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

Google Web Vitals

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Time To First Byte (TTFB)47 ms49 ms64 ms97 msruns disagree ±51%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.380 s1.416 s2.161 s3.688 sruns disagree ±81%
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0.00610.00670.0070.0082runs disagree ±16%

Visual Metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First visual change400 ms433 ms423 ms435 msstable ±4%
Last visual change2.774 s2.833 s3.558 s5.066 sruns disagree ±40%
Speed index1.346 s1.358 s1.927 s3.077 sruns disagree ±64%
Visual readiness2.339 s2.400 s3.135 s4.666 sruns disagree ±48%
Visual complete 851.872 s1.900 s2.646 s4.166 sruns disagree ±60%
Visual complete 952.006 s2.033 s2.780 s4.300 sruns disagree ±56%
Visual complete 992.407 s2.466 s3.191 s4.700 sruns disagree ±46%

CPU

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Total Blocking Time96 ms106 ms115 ms143 msruns disagree ±22%
Max Potential FID107 ms108 ms108 ms108 msstable ±1%
CPU long tasks 5666varies ±8%
CPU last long task happens at1.182 s2.182 s2.183 s3.184 sruns disagree ±46%

More metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First paint388 ms400 ms401 ms416 msstable ±4%
Load event end968 ms999 ms1.646 s2.972 sruns disagree ±100%

Waterfall

Run 2 SpeedIndex median

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 2 · median
0.000 s
0s1s2s3s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

28 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 300 ms
300 ms
0 %
Frame at 400 ms
400 ms
0 %
Frame at 500 ms
500 ms
31 %
Frame at 600 ms
600 ms
33 %
Frame at 700 ms
700 ms
30 %
Frame at 800 ms
800 ms
33 %
Frame at 900 ms
900 ms
34 %
Frame at 1.000 s
1.000 s
34 %
Frame at 1.100 s
1.100 s
34 %
Frame at 1.200 s
1.200 s
34 %
Frame at 1.300 s
1.300 s
34 %
Frame at 1.400 s
1.400 s
34 %
Frame at 1.500 s
1.500 s
34 %
Frame at 1.600 s
1.600 s
38 %
Frame at 1.700 s
1.700 s
61 %
Frame at 1.800 s
1.800 s
73 %
Frame at 1.900 s
1.900 s
86 %
Frame at 2.000 s
2.000 s
92 %
Frame at 2.100 s
2.100 s
97 %
Frame at 2.200 s
2.200 s
97 %
Frame at 2.300 s
2.300 s
97 %
Frame at 2.400 s
2.400 s
98 %
Frame at 2.500 s
2.500 s
99 %
Frame at 2.600 s
2.600 s
99 %
Frame at 2.700 s
2.700 s
99 %
Frame at 2.800 s
2.800 s
99 %
Frame at 2.900 s
2.900 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Why was rendering delayed?

Rendering was not meaningfully delayed. First paint landed at 400 ms on a 49 ms first byte; the 9 render-blocking requests were done by 154 ms and the remaining ~246 ms is style and layout work. The largest paint followed at 1.416 s. The LCP image itself was downloaded by 814 ms; the wait was render work, not the network.

Want to see how much CSS style-recalculation work delayed FCP and LCP, plus CPU long tasks? Run with --cpu.

Render blocking requests

15 requests · 674.3 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint (the dashed line is FCP, the clock ends at LCP); the gap after the bars is style and layout work. Web fonts are context, not blockers: text renders invisible or in a fallback face while they load, so a font finishing after a paint is the classic reason text changed late.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
www.siarv.it · TTFB 49 ms
43 ms
23.9 KB42 ms
d10d2.jsblocking
javascript · www.siarv.it
71 ms
82.4 KB71 ms
ca29e.jsblocking
javascript · www.siarv.it
70 ms
158.3 KB70 ms
3bcfd.cssblocking
css · www.siarv.it
66 ms
163.6 KB66 ms
9a399.jsblocking
javascript · www.siarv.it
60 ms
31.0 KB60 ms
9512b.jsblocking
javascript · www.siarv.it
34 ms
10.7 KB34 ms
4476d.jsblocking
javascript · www.siarv.it
33 ms
37.7 KB33 ms
3dabc.cssblocking
css · www.siarv.it
27 ms
476 B27 ms
b1a86.cssblocking
css · www.siarv.it
26 ms
7.6 KB26 ms
7 more requests
all done by 371 ms
182.6 KB
LCP resource
siar-societa-italiana_1.jpg — downloaded by 204 ms, rendered at 1.416 s
7 ms
155.7 KB7 ms
web font · fonts.gstatic.com · finished after first paint
87 ms
37.1 KB87 ms
web font · fonts.gstatic.com · finished after first paint
85 ms
47.2 KB85 ms
web font · fonts.gstatic.com · finished after first paint
38 ms
37.5 KB38 ms
0708 ms1.062 sFCP 400 msLCP 1.416 s

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

Performance advice

68
2 errors12 warnings5 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Tag Manager.googleTagManager

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Google Tag Manager makes it possible for non tech users to add scripts to your page that will downgrade performance.

warn(0)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 6 CPU long tasks with the total of 416 ms. The total blocking time is 96 ms and 2 long tasks before first contentful paint with total time of 120 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
warn(0)Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)modernImageFormats

The page ships 22 images (out of 22) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

AVIF and WebP routinely deliver 25–50% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at the same perceived quality, and every browser version still under support understands at least one of them. Ship modern formats either through a <picture> element with <source type="image/avif"> / "image/webp" entries in front of the legacy <img>, or directly from a content-negotiating image pipeline that returns AVIF / WebP when the client accepts it. https://web.dev/articles/serve-images-webp

Offenders
warn(0)Avoid extra requests by setting cache headerscacheHeaders

The page has 20 requests that are missing a cache time. Configure a cache time so the browser doesn't need to download them every time. It will save 1.3 MB the next access.

The easiest way to make your page fast is to avoid doing requests to the server. Setting a cache header on your server response will tell the browser that it doesn't need to download the asset again during the configured cache time! Always try to set a cache time if the content doesn't change for every request.

Offenders
warn(0)Total CSS size shouldn't be too bigcssSize

The total CSS transfer size is 243.9 kB and uncompressed size is 1.7 MB. That is big and the CSS could most probably be smaller.

Delivering a massive amount of CSS to the browser is not the best thing you can do, because it means more work for the browser when parsing the CSS against the HTML and that makes the rendering slower. Try to send only the CSS that is used on that page. And make sure to remove CSS rules when they aren't used anymore.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/52458.css63.9 KB377.3 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/b1a86.css7.2 KB31.9 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/3bcfd.css163.2 KB1.2 MB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/3dabc.css90 B75 B
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Montserrat:700678 B1.8 KB
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css...oogleapis.com/css3.1 KB65.4 KB
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 670.3 kB and the uncompressed size is 2.3 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/4476d.js37.3 KB115.5 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/9512b.js10.3 KB27.4 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/ca29e.js157.9 KB549.1 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/9a399.js30.6 KB100.8 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/d10d2.js82.0 KB371.1 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/d9704.js4.0 KB10.6 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/4d350.js3.4 KB12.2 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/39133.js73.9 KB270.2 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/5071c.js32.7 KB157.9 KB
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js20.9 KB51.1 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/c75a6.js1.3 KB2.9 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/themes/porto/js/libs/webfont.js5.3 KB12.9 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-VY6V55TE93&cx=c&_slc=1162.2 KB466.7 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/assets/js/extensio...slideanims.min.js6.7 KB28.4 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/assets/js/extensio...ranimation.min.js14.0 KB54.5 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/assets/js/extensio...navigation.min.js6.9 KB25.5 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=7.1.35.3 KB22.2 KB
warn(40)Don't scale images in the browseravoidScalingImages

The page has 6 images that are scaled more than 100 pixels. It would be better if those images are sent so the browser don't need to scale them.

It's easy to scale images in the browser and make sure they look good in different devices, however that is bad for performance! Scaling images in the browser takes extra CPU time and will hurt performance on mobile. And the user will download extra kilobytes (sometimes megabytes) of data that could be avoided. Don't do that, make sure you create multiple version of the same image server-side and serve the appropriate one.

Offenders
warn(40)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 6 below-the-fold images without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync
warn(50)Avoid slowing down the critical rendering pathavoidRenderBlocking

The page has 9 blocking requests and 0 in body parser blocking (5 JavaScript and 4 CSS).

The critical rendering path is what the browser needs to do to start rendering the page. Every file requested inside of the head element will postpone the rendering of the page, because the browser need to do the request. Avoid loading JavaScript synchronously inside of the head (you should not need JavaScript to render the page), request files from the same domain as the main document (to avoid DNS lookups) and inline CSS for really fast rendering and a short rendering path.

Offenders
infoThe favicon should be small and cacheablefavicon

The favicon has no cache time.

It is easy to make the favicon big but please avoid doing that, because every browser will then perform an unnecessarily large download. And make sure the cache headers are set for a long time for the favicon. It is easy to miss since it's another content type.

Offenders
infoAvoid too many fontsfewFonts

The page has 5 font requests. Do you really need them? What value does the fonts give the user?

How many fonts do you need on a page for the user to get the message? Fonts can slow down the rendering of content, try to avoid loading too many of them because worst case it can make the text invisible until they are loaded (FOIT—flash of invisible text), best case they will flicker the text content when they arrive.

Offenders
warn(50)Total image size shouldn't be too bigimageSize

The page total image size is 1.5 MB. It's really big. Is the page using the right format for the images? Can they be lazy loaded? Are they compressed as good as they can be? Make them smaller by using https://imageoptim.com/.

Avoid having too many large images on the page. The images will not affect the first paint of the page, but it will eat bandwidth for the user.

warn(60)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 4 requests with private headers. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 32 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders
error(80)Have a fast largest contentful paintlargestContentfulPaint

Largest contentful paint can be improved 3.688 s. It is in the Google Web Vitals needs improvement range, slower than 2.5 seconds.

Largest contentful paint is one of Google Web Vitals and reports the render time of the largest image or text block visible within the viewport, relative to when the page first started loading. To be fast according to Google, it needs to render before 2.5 seconds and results over 4 seconds is poor performance.

Offenders
infoMake each CSS response smalloptimalCssSize

https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/52458.css size is 65.5 kB (65459) and that is bigger than the limit of 25 kB. https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/3bcfd.css size is 167.1 kB (167117) and that is bigger than the limit of 25 kB. Try to keep each CSS response under 25 kB.

Render-blocking CSS holds up the first paint until it has fully downloaded, parsed and applied, so smaller CSS files mean a faster start. Split your CSS into a small critical bundle inlined or eagerly loaded, with the rest lazy-loaded.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/52458.css63.9 KB377.3 KB
https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/3bcfd.css163.2 KB1.2 MB
warn(90)Inline CSS for faster first renderinlineCss

The page has both inline styles as well as it is requesting 5 CSS files inside of the head. Let's only inline CSS for really fast render.

In the early days of the Internet, inlining CSS was one of the ugliest things you can do. That has changed if you want your page to start rendering fast for your user. Always inline the critical CSS when you use HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 (avoid doing CSS requests that block rendering) and lazy load and cache the rest of the CSS. It is a little more complicated when using HTTP/2. Does your server support HTTP push? Then maybe that can help. Do you have a lot of users on a slow connection and are serving large chunks of HTML? Then it could be better to use the inline technique, becasue some servers always prioritize HTML content over CSS so the user needs to download the HTML first, before the CSS is downloaded.

Offenders
error(90)Avoid Frontend single point of failuresspof

The page has 1 request inside of the head that can cause a SPOF (single point of failure). Load them asynchronously or move them outside of the document head.

A page can be stopped from loading in the browser if a single JavaScript, CSS, and in some cases a font, couldn't be fetched or is loading really slowly (the white screen of death). That is a scenario you really want to avoid. Never load 3rd-party components synchronously inside of the head tag.

Offenders

Best practice advice

81
1 warning2 info
infoMeta descriptionmetaDescription

The page is missing a meta description.

Use a page description to make the page more relevant to search engines.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 39 responses that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 2 responses that sets a pragma no-cache header (that is a request header). There are 30 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders
warn(50)Avoid too many third party requeststhirdParty

The page do 18% requests to third party domains (11 requests and 383.8 kB). First party is 50 requests and 2.3 MB. The regex .*siarv.* was used to calculate first/third party requests.

Do not load most of your content from third party URLs.

Privacy advice

54
1 error8 warnings4 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Analyticsga

The page is using Google Analytics meaning you share your users private information with Google. You should use analytics that care about user privacy, something like https://matomo.org.

Google Analytics share private user information with Google that your user hasn't agreed on sharing.

warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Avoid embedding services from surveillance capitalist companiessurveillance

The page embeds 2 resources from companies that profit from user surveillance. Consider privacy-respecting alternatives.

Embedding scripts or iframes from companies whose business model is surveillance capitalism (Google, Facebook, etc.) leaks detailed user data on every page view, often before the user has had a chance to consent. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism for background. Prefer privacy-respecting alternatives where possible.

Offenders
warn(0)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

Set a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting attacks. You can start with a Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header, which only reports violations rather than blocking them.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a NEL header so the browser reports network errors back to you.nelHeader

Set a NEL header (paired with Reporting-Endpoints) to collect connection-level error reports from the field.

The NEL (Network Error Logging) response header tells the browser to record connection-level failures (DNS, TLS, HTTP errors) and ship them to a reporting endpoint. NEL pairs with the Reporting-Endpoints / Report-To header — the page declares the endpoint group and NEL points at it. Together they give you visibility into errors that never reach your origin server. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/NEL

Offenders
warn(0)Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.referrerPolicyHeader

Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.

Referrer Policy is a new header that allows a site to control how much information the browser includes with navigations away from a document and should be set by all sites. https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-referrer-policy/.

Offenders
infoDeclare reporting endpoints so the browser can deliver Reporting-API events.reportingEndpointsHeader

Set a Reporting-Endpoints header (or the legacy Report-To header) so CSP reports, NEL data and other Reporting-API events have an endpoint to land at.

The Reporting-Endpoints response header (the successor to Report-To) names the URLs that browsers should POST reports to. Without it, CSP report-to directives, Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy reports, NEL data and other Reporting-API events have nowhere to go. The legacy Report-To header is still accepted for older Chromium versions. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Reporting-Endpoints

Offenders
error(0)Set a strict transport header to make sure the user always use HTTPS.strictTransportSecurityHeader

Set a strict transport header to make sure the user always use HTTPS.

The HTTP Strict-Transport-Security response header (often abbreviated as HSTS) lets a web site tell browsers that it should only be accessed using HTTPS, instead of using HTTP. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Strict-Transport-Security.

Offenders
warn(0)Do not share user data with third parties.thirdPartyPrivacy

The page has 18% requests that are 3rd party (11 requests with a size of 383.8 kB). The page also have request to companies that harvest data from users and do not respect users privacy (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism). The page do 11 surveillance requests and uses 3 surveillance tools. The page do 3 analytics requests and uses 1 analytics tool. The page do 1 tag-manager request and uses 1 tag-manager tool.

Using third party requests shares user information with that third party. Please avoid that! The project https://github.com/patrickhulce/third-party-web is used to categorize first/third party requests.

Offenders
warn(0)Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to stop the browser from MIME-sniffing the response.xContentTypeOptionsHeader

Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff on the document response to prevent MIME-sniffing.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff prevents browsers from interpreting files as a different MIME type than what is declared in the Content-Type header. This blocks a class of cross-site scripting and content-type confusion attacks and should be set on every response. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/X-Content-Type-Options

Offenders

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleHome - SiarvThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
GeneratorWordPress 7.1.3The tool or CMS that generated the HTML, from the page generator meta tag.
Layout viewport1350 × 2437 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements856Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth16How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth28Deep treeThe deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes0No embedded documents on this page.
Script tags41Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage94 BData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

6 technologies

Third-party tools

6 tools

Data collected using Third Party Web version 0.29.2.

Cdn
  • Google Fonts
Surveillance
  • Google Fonts
  • Google Analytics
  • Google Tag Manager
Analytics
  • Google Analytics
Tag-manager
  • Google Tag Manager

Data from run 2

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index1.36 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change0.43 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change2.83 sscreen stops changing · 2.40 s after first
≥95% rendered
≥99%
0.43 sFirst Visual Change
Visual Complete 85%1.90 s
Visual Complete 95%2.03 s
Visual Complete 99%2.47 s
Last Visual Change2.83 s
Visual Readiness2.40 s· first to last change
00.5 s1.0 s1.5 s2.0 s2.5 s
Content milestones
Perception index
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 0.6 s0.6s
Visual progress at 1 s1.0s
Visual progress at 1.4 s1.4s
Visual progress at 1.7 s1.7s
Visual progress at 2.1 s2.1s
Visual progress at 2.5 s2.5s
Visual progress at 2.9 s2.9s
FCP0.40s
LCP1.42s
VC851.90s
Long tasks
0.0s0.6s1.2s1.7s2.3s2.9s

Google Web Vitals

from run 2

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

1.416 sLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB49 ms
  • Resource load delay13 ms
  • Resource load duration149 ms
  • Element render delay1.205 s

Element

Element type
<div>
Size (w × h)
548100
URL
https://cdn.siarv.it...ta-italiana_1.jpg
Load time
814 ms

DOM path

body > div:eq(1) > div:eq(1) > div#banner-wrapper > div#rev_slider_2_1_forcefullwidth > div#rev_slider_2_1_wrapper > div#rev_slider_2_1 > ul > li:eq(0) > div:eq(0) > div
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

The Largest Contentful Paint API matched this image:

LCP element

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.007cumulative layout shift score

One shift is 93% of your 0.007 CLS. div:eq(1) moved at 479 ms. Reserve space for whatever renders into that spot, a fixed height or an aspect-ratio box, so later content stops pushing the page around.

Elements that shifted

Worst first, showing shifts of 0.01 and up. Each percentage is that shift's exact share of the score.

The shift is spread across many movements below 0.01, none large enough to single out. Check the video or filmstrip to see what moved.

Layout shift

Elements that shifted by more than 0.01 are highlighted in the screenshot. If an element shifted outside the viewport, it won't appear here. Check the video or filmstrip to see the shift.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionHTTP/1.1
Total requests61
Total domains7
Transfer size2.5 MB
Content size5.6 MB
Missing compression0

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://www.siarv.it/

HeaderValue
connectionkeep-alive
content-encodinggzip
content-length23669
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
dateSat, 17 Oct 2026 16:22:12 GMT
link<https://www.siarv.it/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/", <https://www.siarv.it/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/143>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json", <https://www.siarv.it/>; rel=shortlink
permissions-policyprivate-state-token-redemption=(self "https://www.google.com" "https://www.gstatic.com" "https://recaptcha.net" "https://challenges.cloudflare.com" "https://hcaptcha.com"), private-state-token-issuance=(self "https://www.google.com" "https://www.gstatic.com" "https://recaptcha.net" "https://challenges.cloudflare.com" "https://hcaptcha.com")
upgradeh2,h2c
varyAccept-Encoding
x-cache-statusHIT
x-served-bywww.siarv.it
x-w3tc-cdnftp

Response codes

200
6098.4%
204
11.6%

Requests and sizes per content type

7 types

Transfer size2.5 MB

  • image57.7%
  • javascript25.1%
  • css9.1%
  • font7.2%
  • html0.89%
  • favicon0.04%
  • plain0.02%

Content size5.6 MB

  • javascript39.7%
  • css29.1%
  • image26.2%
  • font3.3%
  • html1.7%
  • favicon0.02%
  • plain0.00%

Requests61

  • image45.9%
  • javascript27.9%
  • css9.8%
  • font8.2%
  • html3.3%
  • plain3.3%
  • favicon1.6%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html1.4 KB23.1 KB99.4 KB2
css1.5 KB238.2 KB1.6 MB6
javascript6.0 KB654.6 KB2.2 MB17
image9.6 KB1.5 MB1.5 MB28
font0 b187.4 KB187.3 KB5
favicon285 B1.1 KB1.1 KB1
plain0 b463 B15 B2
Total18.8 KB2.5 MB5.6 MB61

Data per domain

7 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
www.siarv.it4.999 s961.6 KB3.6 MB31
cdn.siarv.it9.250 s1.2 MB1.2 MB19
fonts.googleapis.com2.715 s3.7 KB67.2 KB2
www.google-analytics.com165 ms21.4 KB51.1 KB2
fonts.gstatic.com398 ms187.4 KB187.3 KB5
www.googletagmanager.com216 ms162.2 KB466.7 KB1
region1.google-analytics.com135 msN/A0 b1

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds4 weeks1 year
Last modified0 seconds1 year28 years

Requests loaded after onLoad event

13 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html22 B1
css0 b0
javascript5.3 KB1
image317.7 KB10
font0 b0
favicon1.1 KB1
Total324.1 KB13

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

14 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html22 B1
css0 b0
javascript12.1 KB2
image317.7 KB10
font0 b0
favicon1.1 KB1
Total330.9 KB14

CPU

https://www.siarv.it/siar/wp-content/cache/minify/4476d.js is responsible for 40% of blocking time
77 ms of 190 ms total. Defer it, replace it with a lighter alternative, or move its work off the main thread to recover most of your TBT.
Get deeper CPU insight with one extra run
Run with --enableProfileRun to see where main-thread time went, blocking time and CPU cost per script, module and function, forced reflows and frame stability. The data is collected in one extra run, so the timing metrics of your measured runs stay untouched.

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT143 ms
Max potential input delay108 ms
Total long tasks6
Total time470 ms
Last task at2.182 s
Before first paint77 ms1 task
Before FCP77 ms1 task
Before LCP395 ms5 tasks
After load176 ms2 tasks

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames10every frame ≥ 50 ms
Blocking time242.2 msacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout150.1 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP217.8 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first
Blocking after load120 msafter the load event — didn't delay page load
Input waiting2 framesa real interaction was delayed (INP)

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
4476d.js4219.4 ms76.8 ms55.3 mstimer or animation callback, script tag
js3rd party1101 ms66.6 ms–script tag
ca29e.js4156.6 ms40.7 ms51.1 mstimer or animation callback, script tag
inline script in the document267.1 ms2.4 ms43.7 msmodule script, event handler, script tag
d10d2.js115.8 ms1.8 ms–script tag

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 160.6 msat 1.202 s · before LCP
blocking 95.6 ms
  • Scripts & other work116.2 ms
  • Animation callbacks43.9 ms
  • Style & layout0.5 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 8.5 ms
js3rd party
Ran for
101 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran for
43.9 ms
Forced style and layout
8.5 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
s
Position in source
character 402927 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #2 · 137.3 msat 584.6 ms · before LCP
blocking 74.7 ms
  • Scripts & other work120.9 ms
  • Animation callbacks16.4 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 24.7 ms
Ran for
108.4 ms
Forced style and layout
24.7 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 27411 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #3 · 232.9 msat 77.6 ms · before LCP
blocking 27.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work232.8 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.1 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
4 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 25.2 ms
Ran for
24.7 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran for
47.9 ms
Forced style and layout
25.2 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran for
8.1 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran for
15.8 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #4 · 74.9 msat 2.182 s · after load
blocking 24.4 ms
  • Scripts & other work0.6 ms
  • Animation callbacks69.9 ms
  • Style & layout4.4 ms
  • Render0 ms

The browser did not report which script was responsible for this frame — typically its own style/layout work, or a cross-origin script it will not name.

Long animation frame #5 · 116.1 msat 726.7 ms · before LCP
input was waitingblocking 11 ms
  • Scripts & other work111.6 ms
  • Animation callbacks3.9 ms
  • Style & layout0.6 ms
  • Render0 ms
4 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 18.5 ms
Ran for
6.6 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 27411 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
5.3 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 27411 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
20.9 ms
Forced style and layout
5.4 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 27411 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
56.5 ms
Forced style and layout
13.1 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 520407 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #6 · 80.6 msat 845.9 ms · before LCP
blocking 5.5 ms
  • Scripts & other work78.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks2 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
3 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 29.5 ms
Ran for
53.5 ms
Forced style and layout
25.2 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 27411 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
7.2 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 7882 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
8.3 ms
Forced style and layout
4.3 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 534046 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #7 · 57.2 msat 524.9 ms · before LCP
blocking 3.8 ms
  • Scripts & other work33.7 ms
  • Animation callbacks23.5 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 1.1 ms
Ran for
8.1 ms
How it started
module script
Ran for
13.4 ms
Forced style and layout
1.1 ms
Started by
#document.onDOMContentLoaded
How it started
event handler
Source function
onLoad
Position in source
character 332 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)

3 more long frames carried no blocking time (nothing ran past the 50 ms threshold) — long, but harmless to INP and TBT.

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

Scripts forcing layout

3 of 3 scripts

Third party

Third party requests categorised by Third party web version 0.29.2.

Third-party requests22
Tools3
Categories4

Categories

4 categories

Requests by category22

  • survelliance11 req · 3 tools50.0%
  • cdn7 req · 1 tool31.8%
  • analytics3 req · 1 tool13.6%
  • tag-manager1 req · 1 tool4.5%

Third party requests and tools

4 categories
cdnGoogle Fonts7 requests · 1 tool
survellianceGoogle FontsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager11 requests · 3 tools
analyticsGoogle Analytics3 requests · 1 tool
tag-managerGoogle Tag Manager1 requests · 1 tool

First party vs third party

50 first · 11 third party

Transfer size2.5 MB

  • First party2.2 MB85.6%
  • Third party374.8 KB14.4%

Content size5.6 MB

  • First party4.9 MB86.6%
  • Third party772.2 KB13.4%

Requests61

  • First party5082.0%
  • Third party1118.0%

First party requests and sizes per content type

50 requests

Calculated using .*siarv.* (use --firstParty to configure).

ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html1.4 KB23.1 KB99.4 KB2
css1.5 KB234.4 KB1.6 MB4
javascript6.0 KB471.5 KB1.7 MB15
image9.6 KB1.5 MB1.5 MB28
font0 b0 b0 b0
favicon285 B1.1 KB1.1 KB1
Total18.8 KB2.2 MB4.9 MB50

Third party requests and sizes per content type

11 requests
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b0 b0 b0
css0 b3.7 KB67.2 KB2
javascript0 b183.1 KB517.8 KB2
image0 b0 b0 b0
font0 b187.4 KB187.3 KB5
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b463 B15 B2
TotalN/A374.8 KB772.2 KB11

Lighthouse (version 13.0.1)