Page summary

https://www.whiteready.com/it/home-italiano/

Tested 2026-10-20 00:01:37 using Chrome 154.0.8037.57 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPUThird partyLighthouse

This page is snappy to interact with and visually stable, but slow to paint, loose on best practices and weak on user privacy.

73 / 100
Coach overall
71 / 100
Performance
81 / 100
Best practice
74 / 100
Privacy

How it loaded →

0 → 6.766 s · median run
Frame at 0 ms
start
Frame at 1400 ms
1.400 s
Frame at 2600 ms
2.600 s
Frame at 4400 ms
Largest paint4.400 s
Frame at 5600 ms
5.600 s
Frame at 6800 ms
Complete6.800 s
300 ms
First Visual Change
2.096 s
Speed Index
6.000 s
Visual Complete 85%
6.766 s
Last Visual Change
TTFB46 msLCP4.024 sTBT74 msCLS0.07

What to act on · top recommendations

Have a fast largest contentful paint

0 / 100

Largest contentful paint is poor 4.024 s. It is in the Google Web Vitals poor range, slower than 4 seconds.

Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)

0 / 100

The page ships 29 images (out of 29) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

Avoid extra requests by setting cache headers

0 / 100

The page has 10 requests that are missing a cache time. Configure a cache time so the browser doesn't need to download them every time. It will save 33.6 kB the next access.

Google Web Vitals

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Time To First Byte (TTFB)37 ms46 ms45 ms52 msruns disagree ±16%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.020 s4.024 s4.033 s4.056 sstable ±1%
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0.07410.07410.07410.0741identical

Visual Metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First visual change266 ms300 ms289 ms300 msvaries ±6%
Last visual change6.766 s6.766 s6.777 s6.800 sstable ±1%
Speed index1.989 s2.096 s2.063 s2.104 sstable ±3%
Visual readiness6.466 s6.500 s6.489 s6.500 sstable ±1%
Visual complete 856.000 s6.000 s6.011 s6.033 sstable ±1%
Visual complete 956.733 s6.733 s6.744 s6.766 sstable ±1%
Visual complete 996.766 s6.766 s6.777 s6.800 sstable ±1%

CPU

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Total Blocking Time74 ms74 ms76 ms79 msstable ±3%
Max Potential FID114 ms116 ms119 ms126 msvaries ±5%
CPU long tasks 3334runs disagree ±17%
CPU last long task happens at925 ms935 ms947 ms981 msstable ±3%

More metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First paint244 ms292 ms276 ms292 msvaries ±8%
Load event end1.061 s1.073 s1.087 s1.127 sstable ±3%

Waterfall

Run 3 SpeedIndex median

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 3 · median
0.000 s
0s2s4s6s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

60 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 300 ms
300 ms
34 %
Frame at 400 ms
400 ms
33 %
Frame at 500 ms
500 ms
33 %
Frame at 600 ms
600 ms
45 %
Frame at 700 ms
700 ms
46 %
Frame at 800 ms
800 ms
46 %
Frame at 900 ms
900 ms
46 %
Frame at 1.000 s
1.000 s
66 %
Frame at 1.100 s
1.100 s
66 %
Frame at 1.200 s
1.200 s
78 %
Frame at 1.300 s
1.300 s
78 %
Frame at 1.400 s
1.400 s
78 %
Frame at 1.500 s
1.500 s
78 %
Frame at 1.600 s
1.600 s
78 %
Frame at 1.700 s
1.700 s
78 %
Frame at 1.800 s
1.800 s
79 %
Frame at 1.900 s
1.900 s
79 %
Frame at 2.000 s
2.000 s
79 %
Frame at 2.100 s
2.100 s
79 %
Frame at 2.200 s
2.200 s
79 %
Frame at 2.300 s
2.300 s
79 %
Frame at 2.400 s
2.400 s
79 %
Frame at 2.500 s
2.500 s
75 %
Frame at 2.600 s
2.600 s
74 %
Frame at 2.700 s
2.700 s
69 %
Frame at 2.800 s
2.800 s
70 %
Frame at 2.900 s
2.900 s
69 %
Frame at 3.000 s
3.000 s
68 %
Frame at 3.100 s
3.100 s
68 %
Frame at 3.200 s
3.200 s
68 %
Frame at 3.300 s
3.300 s
67 %
Frame at 3.400 s
3.400 s
67 %
Frame at 3.500 s
3.500 s
67 %
Frame at 4.100 s
4.100 s
67 %
Frame at 4.400 s
4.400 s
68 %
Frame at 4.500 s
4.500 s
69 %
Frame at 4.600 s
4.600 s
70 %
Frame at 4.700 s
4.700 s
72 %
Frame at 4.800 s
4.800 s
70 %
Frame at 4.900 s
4.900 s
75 %
Frame at 5.000 s
5.000 s
81 %
Frame at 5.100 s
5.100 s
82 %
Frame at 5.200 s
5.200 s
82 %
Frame at 5.300 s
5.300 s
82 %
Frame at 5.400 s
5.400 s
83 %
Frame at 5.500 s
5.500 s
83 %
Frame at 5.600 s
5.600 s
83 %
Frame at 5.700 s
5.700 s
84 %
Frame at 5.800 s
5.800 s
84 %
Frame at 5.900 s
5.900 s
85 %
Frame at 6.000 s
6.000 s
84 %
Frame at 6.100 s
6.100 s
88 %
Frame at 6.200 s
6.200 s
89 %
Frame at 6.300 s
6.300 s
89 %
Frame at 6.400 s
6.400 s
89 %
Frame at 6.500 s
6.500 s
90 %
Frame at 6.600 s
6.600 s
92 %
Frame at 6.700 s
6.700 s
93 %
Frame at 6.800 s
6.800 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Why was rendering delayed?

Rendering was not meaningfully delayed. First paint landed at 292 ms on a 52 ms first byte; the 9 render-blocking requests were done by 182 ms and the remaining ~110 ms is style and layout work. The largest paint followed at 4.056 s. The LCP image itself was downloaded by 1.436 s; the wait was render work, not the network.

Want to see how much CSS style-recalculation work delayed FCP and LCP, plus CPU long tasks? Run with --cpu.

Render blocking requests

29 requests · 418.5 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint (the dashed line is FCP, the clock ends at LCP); the gap after the bars is style and layout work. Web fonts are context, not blockers: text renders invisible or in a fallback face while they load, so a font finishing after a paint is the classic reason text changed late.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
www.whiteready.com · TTFB 52 ms
55 ms
38.6 KB53 ms
css · www.whiteready.com
107 ms
49.0 KB107 ms
css · www.whiteready.com
102 ms
1.2 KB102 ms
style.cssblocking
css · www.whiteready.com
74 ms
2.0 KB74 ms
css · www.whiteready.com
66 ms
753 B66 ms
css · www.whiteready.com
58 ms
10.0 KB58 ms
css · www.whiteready.com
51 ms
12.8 KB51 ms
be.min.cssblocking
css · www.whiteready.com
49 ms
72.6 KB49 ms
script.jsblocking
javascript · cdn-cookieyes.com
33 ms
9.0 KB33 ms
21 more requests
all done by 414 ms
261.3 KB
LCP resource
sfondo1-a.png — downloaded by 1.428 s, rendered at 4.056 s
68 ms
31.9 KB68 ms
web font · www.whiteready.com · finished after first paint
276 ms
78.8 KB276 ms
web font · fonts.gstatic.com · finished after first paint
31 ms
33.9 KB31 ms
web font · www.whiteready.com · finished after first paint
50 ms
7.7 KB50 ms
1.014 s2.028 s3.042 sFCP 292 msLCP 4.056 s

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

Performance advice

71
2 errors11 warnings4 info
error(0)Have a fast largest contentful paintlargestContentfulPaint

Largest contentful paint is poor 4.024 s. It is in the Google Web Vitals poor range, slower than 4 seconds.

Largest contentful paint is one of Google Web Vitals and reports the render time of the largest image or text block visible within the viewport, relative to when the page first started loading. To be fast according to Google, it needs to render before 2.5 seconds and results over 4 seconds is poor performance.

Offenders
warn(0)Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)modernImageFormats

The page ships 29 images (out of 29) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

AVIF and WebP routinely deliver 25–50% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at the same perceived quality, and every browser version still under support understands at least one of them. Ship modern formats either through a <picture> element with <source type="image/avif"> / "image/webp" entries in front of the legacy <img>, or directly from a content-negotiating image pipeline that returns AVIF / WebP when the client accepts it. https://web.dev/articles/serve-images-webp

Offenders
warn(0)Avoid extra requests by setting cache headerscacheHeaders
warn(0)Total CSS size shouldn't be too bigcssSize

The total CSS transfer size is 160.6 kB and uncompressed size is 762 kB. That is big and the CSS could most probably be smaller.

Delivering a massive amount of CSS to the browser is not the best thing you can do, because it means more work for the browser when parsing the CSS against the HTML and that makes the rendering slower. Try to send only the CSS that is used on that page. And make sure to remove CSS rules when they aren't used anymore.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/css/sr7.css?ver=6.7.291.8 KB3.9 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/css/be.min.css?ver=28.3.172.6 KB450.4 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/fonts/fontawesome/fontaweso...ntawesome.min.css12.8 KB57.5 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/css/responsive.min.css?ver=28.3.110.0 KB55.7 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/uploads/betheme/fonts/mfn-local-fonts.css?ver=1753 B4.5 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme-child/style.css?ver=7.1.32.0 KB4.9 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/css/elements/divider-2.css?ver=28.3.149.0 KB138.7 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/uploads/betheme/css/post-2631.css?ver=17923477341.2 KB5.4 KB
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Montserrat:wght@400;500;600;800&display=swap1.1 KB7.4 KB
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Hanken+Grotesk:wght@400;700&display=swap657 B3.2 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/css/fonts/revicons/css/revicons.css1.6 KB4.3 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/css/sr7.lp.css1.5 KB4.1 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/css/sr7.nav.css1.0 KB2.3 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/css/sr7.media.css984 B1.7 KB
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 553.2 kB and the uncompressed size is 1.9 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://cdn-cookieyes.com/client_data/634c731b1c3ffc19e96536ca/script.js9.0 KB24.6 KB
https://widgets.ecologi.com/ecologi-impact-banner.js3.3 KB14.3 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.130.0 KB85.5 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=3.4.15.1 KB13.3 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/core.min.js?ver=1.14.26.7 KB18.2 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/tabs.min.js?ver=1.14.24.1 KB11.5 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/plugins/debouncedresize.min.js?ver=28.3.1667 B472 B
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/plugins/magnificpopup.min.js?ver=28.3.17.5 KB19.8 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/menu.min.js?ver=28.3.11022 B1.5 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/plugins/visible.min.js?ver=28.3.1748 B608 B
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/plugins/enllax.min.js?ver=28.3.1899 B1.5 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/parallax/translate3d.min.js?ver=28.3.11.1 KB1.5 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/scripts.min.js?ver=28.3.123.6 KB104.4 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/accessibility.min.js?ver=28.3.13.7 KB13.3 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme-child/js/accessibility.js?ver=1.12.1 KB5.8 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/plugins/waypoints.min.js?ver=28.3.13.0 KB8.8 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/plugins/chart.min.js?ver=28.3.11.9 KB3.7 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/js/plugins/countdown.min.js?ver=28.3.1959 B1.1 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/js/libs/tptools.js?ver=6.7.2973.2 KB203.1 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/js/sr7.js?ver=6.7.2991.0 KB322.1 KB
https://embeds.acswapp.com/accessibility/app.js1.0 KB1.0 KB
https://cdn-cookieyes.com/client_data/634c731b1c3ffc19e96536ca/banner.js7.5 KB22.6 KB
https://widgets.ecologi.com/tokens-B-IRcmH5.js20.0 KB56.6 KB
https://widgets.ecologi.com/types-D4P789nv.js636 B208 B
https://eu.acsbapp.com/apps/app/dist/js/app.js241.5 KB891.9 KB
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 83 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders
warn(20)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 4 CPU long tasks with the total of 277 ms. The total blocking time is 77 ms . However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
infoAvoid too many fontsfewFonts
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 21 images (out of 34) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders
warn(48)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 13 below-the-fold images without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
warn(50)Total image size shouldn't be too bigimageSize

The page total image size is 1 MB. It's really big. Is the page using the right format for the images? Can they be lazy loaded? Are they compressed as good as they can be? Make them smaller by using https://imageoptim.com/.

Avoid having too many large images on the page. The images will not affect the first paint of the page, but it will eat bandwidth for the user.

warn(60)Don't scale images in the browseravoidScalingImages

The page has 4 images that are scaled more than 100 pixels. It would be better if those images are sent so the browser don't need to scale them.

It's easy to scale images in the browser and make sure they look good in different devices, however that is bad for performance! Scaling images in the browser takes extra CPU time and will hurt performance on mobile. And the user will download extra kilobytes (sometimes megabytes) of data that could be avoided. Don't do that, make sure you create multiple version of the same image server-side and serve the appropriate one.

Offenders
error(80)Avoid Frontend single point of failuresspof

The page has 2 requests inside of the head that can cause a SPOF (single point of failure). Load them asynchronously or move them outside of the document head.

A page can be stopped from loading in the browser if a single JavaScript, CSS, and in some cases a font, couldn't be fetched or is loading really slowly (the white screen of death). That is a scenario you really want to avoid. Never load 3rd-party components synchronously inside of the head tag.

Offenders
infoMake each CSS response smalloptimalCssSize

https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/css/be.min.css?ver=28.3.1 size is 74.3 kB (74297) and that is bigger than the limit of 25 kB. https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/css/elements/divider-2.css?ver=28.3.1 size is 50.2 kB (50158) and that is bigger than the limit of 25 kB. Try to keep each CSS response under 25 kB.

Render-blocking CSS holds up the first paint until it has fully downloaded, parsed and applied, so smaller CSS files mean a faster start. Split your CSS into a small critical bundle inlined or eagerly loaded, with the rest lazy-loaded.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/css/be.min.css?ver=28.3.172.6 KB450.4 KB
https://www.whiteready.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/css/elements/divider-2.css?ver=28.3.149.0 KB138.7 KB
warn(80)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 2 requests with private headers. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
warn(90)Avoid slowing down the critical rendering pathavoidRenderBlocking

The page has 9 blocking requests and 0 in body parser blocking (1 JavaScript and 8 CSS).

The critical rendering path is what the browser needs to do to start rendering the page. Every file requested inside of the head element will postpone the rendering of the page, because the browser need to do the request. Avoid loading JavaScript synchronously inside of the head (you should not need JavaScript to render the page), request files from the same domain as the main document (to avoid DNS lookups) and inline CSS for really fast rendering and a short rendering path.

Offenders
warn(95)Inline CSS for faster first renderinlineCss

The page has both inline CSS and CSS requests even though it uses a HTTP/2-ish connection. If you have many users on slow connections, it can be better to only inline the CSS. Run your own tests and check the waterfall graph to see what happens.

In the early days of the Internet, inlining CSS was one of the ugliest things you can do. That has changed if you want your page to start rendering fast for your user. Always inline the critical CSS when you use HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 (avoid doing CSS requests that block rendering) and lazy load and cache the rest of the CSS. It is a little more complicated when using HTTP/2. Does your server support HTTP push? Then maybe that can help. Do you have a lot of users on a slow connection and are serving large chunks of HTML? Then it could be better to use the inline technique, becasue some servers always prioritize HTML content over CSS so the user needs to download the HTML first, before the CSS is downloaded.

Best practice advice

81
1 warning2 info
infoMeta descriptionmetaDescription

The page is missing a meta description.

Use a page description to make the page more relevant to search engines.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 77 responses that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 22 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders
warn(50)Avoid too many third party requeststhirdParty

The page do 23% requests to third party domains (22 requests and 379.4 kB). First party is 75 requests and 1.4 MB. The regex .*whiteready.* was used to calculate first/third party requests.

Do not load most of your content from third party URLs.

Privacy advice

74
1 error6 warnings4 info
warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

Set a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting attacks. You can start with a Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header, which only reports violations rather than blocking them.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a NEL header so the browser reports network errors back to you.nelHeader

Set a NEL header (paired with Reporting-Endpoints) to collect connection-level error reports from the field.

The NEL (Network Error Logging) response header tells the browser to record connection-level failures (DNS, TLS, HTTP errors) and ship them to a reporting endpoint. NEL pairs with the Reporting-Endpoints / Report-To header — the page declares the endpoint group and NEL points at it. Together they give you visibility into errors that never reach your origin server. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/NEL

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
infoDeclare reporting endpoints so the browser can deliver Reporting-API events.reportingEndpointsHeader

Set a Reporting-Endpoints header (or the legacy Report-To header) so CSP reports, NEL data and other Reporting-API events have an endpoint to land at.

The Reporting-Endpoints response header (the successor to Report-To) names the URLs that browsers should POST reports to. Without it, CSP report-to directives, Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy reports, NEL data and other Reporting-API events have nowhere to go. The legacy Report-To header is still accepted for older Chromium versions. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Reporting-Endpoints

Offenders
warn(0)Do not share user data with third parties.thirdPartyPrivacy

The page has 6% requests that are 3rd party (6 requests with a size of 322.8 kB). The page also have request to companies that harvest data from users and do not respect users privacy (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism). The page do 4 survelliance requests and uses 1 survelliance tool. The page do 4 surveillance requests and uses 1 surveillance tool. The page do 2 utility requests and uses 1 utility tool.

Using third party requests shares user information with that third party. Please avoid that! The project https://github.com/patrickhulce/third-party-web is used to categorize first/third party requests.

Offenders
warn(0)Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to stop the browser from MIME-sniffing the response.xContentTypeOptionsHeader

Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff on the document response to prevent MIME-sniffing.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff prevents browsers from interpreting files as a different MIME type than what is declared in the Content-Type header. This blocks a class of cross-site scripting and content-type confusion attacks and should be set on every response. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/X-Content-Type-Options

Offenders
error(90)Set a strict transport header to make sure the user always use HTTPS.strictTransportSecurityHeader

A strict transport header is set but miss out on setting includeSubDomains

The HTTP Strict-Transport-Security response header (often abbreviated as HSTS) lets a web site tell browsers that it should only be accessed using HTTPS, instead of using HTTP. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Strict-Transport-Security.

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleWhiteready: Hosting Sicurezza, Soluzioni per il webThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
GeneratorWordPress 7.1.3The tool or CMS that generated the HTML, from the page generator meta tag.
Layout viewport1350 × 6206 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements1,271Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth13How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth35Very deep treeThe deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes1Embedded documents. Each is a separate page the browser loads and renders.
Script tags32Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Resource hints

2 hints
preconnect
  • https://fonts.googleapis.com/
  • https://fonts.gstatic.com/

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

12 technologies

Third-party tools

4 tools

Data collected using Third Party Web version 0.29.2.

Cdn
  • Google Fonts
Survelliance
  • Google Fonts
Surveillance
  • Google Fonts
Utility
  • Accessibe Accessibility Overlay

Data from run 3

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index2.10 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change0.30 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change6.80 sscreen stops changing · 6.50 s after first
≥85%
0.30 sFirst Visual Change
Visual Complete 85%6.03 s
Visual Complete 95% · Visual Complete 99% · Last Visual Change6.77 s
Visual Readiness6.50 s· first to last change
02.0 s4.0 s6.0 s
Content milestones
Perception index
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 1 s1.0s
Visual progress at 1.9 s1.9s
Visual progress at 2.7 s2.7s
Visual progress at 4.1 s4.1s
Visual progress at 5.1 s5.1s
Visual progress at 6 s6.0s
Visual progress at 6.8 s6.8s
FCP0.29s
LCP4.06s
VC856.03s
Long tasks
0.0s1.4s2.7s4.1s5.4s6.8s

Google Web Vitals

from run 3

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

4.056 sLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB52 ms
  • Resource load delay4.235 s
  • Resource load duration2 ms
  • Element render delay-233 ms

Element

Element type
<sr7-img>
Element id
SR7_5_1-6-6
Size (w × h)
292974
URL
https://www.whiterea.../02/sfondo1-a.png
Load time
1.436 s

DOM path

body > div#Wrapper > div#Content > div > main > div > div > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > div > div:eq(1) > div > div > div > sr7-module#SR7_5_1 > sr7-content > sr7-slide#SR7_5_1-6 > sr7-img#SR7_5_1-6-6
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

The Largest Contentful Paint API matched this image:

LCP element

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.074cumulative layout shift score

One shift is 100% of your 0.074 CLS. sr7-module-bg moved at 543 ms. Reserve space for whatever renders into that spot, a fixed height or an aspect-ratio box, so later content stops pushing the page around.

Elements that shifted

Worst first, showing shifts of 0.01 and up. Each percentage is that shift's exact share of the score.

  • 0.074
    100% of CLSshifted at 543 ms
    <sr7-module-bg style="background: linear-gradient(rgb(205, 214, 219) 0%, rgb(255, 255, 255) 9%, rgb(255, 255, 255) 100%); width: 1350px; height: 656.25px; left: 0px;" data-pos="module">
    body > div#Wrapper > div#Content > div > main > div > div > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > div > div:eq(1) > div > div > div > sr7-module#SR7_5_1 > sr7-module-bg
    <div class="menu_wrapper">
    body > div#Wrapper > div#Header_wrapper > header#Header > div#Top_bar > div > div > div:eq(0) > div:eq(1)
Layout shift

Elements that shifted by more than 0.01 are highlighted in the screenshot. If an element shifted outside the viewport, it won't appear here. Check the video or filmstrip to see the shift.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionHTTP/2.0
Total requests97
Total domains11
Transfer size1.7 MB
Content size4.0 MB
Missing compression0

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://www.whiteready.com/it/home-italiano/

HeaderValue
content-encodinggzip
content-length39023
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
dateTue, 20 Oct 2026 00:02:29 GMT
link<https://www.whiteready.com/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/", <https://www.whiteready.com/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/176>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json", <https://www.whiteready.com/>; rel=shortlink
referrer-policyno-referrer-when-downgrade
strict-transport-securitymax-age=63072000; preload
varyAccept-Encoding
x-cache-statusHIT
x-endurance-cache-level2
x-nginx-cacheWordPress
x-served-bywww.whiteready.com

Response codes

200
97100.0%

Requests and sizes per content type

8 types

Transfer size1.7 MB

  • image45.0%
  • javascript30.7%
  • font12.0%
  • css8.9%
  • html2.2%
  • json1.0%
  • svg0.21%
  • plain0.01%

Content size4.0 MB

  • javascript44.8%
  • image24.6%
  • css18.2%
  • html5.1%
  • font5.1%
  • json2.0%
  • svg0.18%
  • plain0.00%

Requests97

  • image36.1%
  • javascript25.8%
  • css14.4%
  • json10.3%
  • font8.2%
  • svg3.1%
  • html1.0%
  • plain1.0%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b38.6 KB209.9 KB1
css0 b156.9 KB744.1 KB14
javascript0 b540.2 KB1.8 MB25
image0 b791.8 KB1003.5 KB35
font0 b211.1 KB208.7 KB8
plain0 b260 B2 B1
json0 b18.0 KB82.6 KB10
svg0 b3.7 KB7.3 KB3
Total0 b1.7 MB4.0 MB97

Data per domain

11 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
www.whiteready.com5.201 s1.1 MB2.6 MB67
cdn-cookieyes.com180 ms29.1 KB97.8 KB9
widgets.ecologi.com71 ms23.8 KB71.1 KB3
whiteready.com436 ms241.5 KB307.6 KB8
fonts.googleapis.com140 ms1.7 KB10.6 KB2
log.cookieyes.com65 ms260 B2 B1
embeds.acswapp.com57 ms1.4 KB1.1 KB2
fonts.gstatic.com62 ms71.0 KB71.0 KB2
api.ecologi.com52 ms686 B164 B1
eu.acsbapp.com51 ms241.5 KB891.9 KB1
eu-cdn.acsbapp.com262 ms1.0 KB987 B1

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds4 weeks1 year
Last modified0 seconds5 weeks1 year

Requests loaded after onLoad event

16 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image196.8 KB15
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
json2.7 KB1
Total199.4 KB16

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

40 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css5.1 KB4
javascript241.5 KB1
image265.8 KB21
font41.6 KB2
favicon0 b0
json17.3 KB9
svg3.7 KB3
Total575.0 KB40

CPU

https://eu.acsbapp.com/apps/app/dist/js/app.js is responsible for 58% of blocking time
75 ms of 130 ms total. Defer it, replace it with a lighter alternative, or move its work off the main thread to recover most of your TBT.
Get deeper CPU insight with one extra run
Run with --enableProfileRun to see where main-thread time went, blocking time and CPU cost per script, module and function, forced reflows and frame stability. The data is collected in one extra run, so the timing metrics of your measured runs stay untouched.

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT79 ms
Max potential input delay126 ms
Total long tasks3
Total time255 ms
Last task at981 ms
Before first paint76 ms1 task
Before FCP76 ms1 task
Before LCP255 ms3 tasks
After load0 ms0 tasks

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames7every frame ≥ 50 ms
Blocking time134.5 msacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout143.2 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP134.5 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first
Input waiting1 framea real interaction was delayed (INP)

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
app.js3rd party1124.3 ms74.9 ms–script tag
inline script in the document2112.2 ms32.3 ms109.1 mstimer or animation callback, script tag
tokens-B-IRcmH5.js3rd party124.8 ms21.1 ms–promise callback
tptools.js262 ms1.2 ms26.7 msscript tag, timer or animation callback
jquery.min.js129.2 ms0 ms7.4 mstimer or animation callback

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 129.1 msat 978.9 ms · before LCP
blocking 77.1 ms
  • Scripts & other work127.9 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.3 ms
  • Style & layout0.9 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
app.js3rd party
Ran for
124.3 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #2 · 85.4 msat 239.7 ms · before LCP
blocking 32.3 ms
  • Scripts & other work15.3 ms
  • Animation callbacks68.6 ms
  • Style & layout1.5 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 68.3 ms
Ran for
68.5 ms
Forced style and layout
68.3 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 9534 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #3 · 74.9 msat 669.9 ms · before LCP
blocking 22.9 ms
  • Scripts & other work26.9 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.1 ms
  • Style & layout47.9 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
24.8 ms
Started by
Response.json.then
How it started
promise callback
Position in source
character 48954 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #4 · 71.4 msat 442.3 ms · before LCP
blocking 2.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work44.3 ms
  • Animation callbacks27.1 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 0.8 ms
Ran for
25 ms
Forced style and layout
0.8 ms
How it started
script tag

3 more long frames carried no blocking time (nothing ran past the 50 ms threshold) — long, but harmless to INP and TBT.

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Top scripts blocking the main thread

4 of 4 scripts

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

Third party

Third party requests categorised by Third party web version 0.29.2.

Third-party requests10
Tools2
Categories3

Categories

3 categories

Requests by category10

  • cdn4 req · 1 tool40.0%
  • survelliance4 req · 1 tool40.0%
  • utility2 req · 1 tool20.0%

Unmatched third party domains

5 domains

Domains that didn't match any tool in Third party web. If you are sure they are third party domains, please do a PR to that project. You can also fine tune the list using --firstParty.

  • cdn-cookieyes.com
  • widgets.ecologi.com
  • log.cookieyes.com
  • embeds.acswapp.com
  • api.ecologi.com

First party vs third party

75 first · 22 third party

Transfer size1.7 MB

  • First party1.4 MB79.0%
  • Third party370.5 KB21.0%

Content size4.0 MB

  • First party2.9 MB72.0%
  • Third party1.1 MB28.0%

Requests97

  • First party7577.3%
  • Third party2222.7%

First party requests and sizes per content type

75 requests

Calculated using .*whiteready.* (use --firstParty to configure).

ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b38.6 KB209.9 KB1
css0 b155.1 KB733.6 KB12
javascript0 b257.4 KB816.2 KB18
image0 b791.8 KB1003.5 KB35
font0 b140.1 KB137.7 KB6
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
json0 b7.0 KB38.1 KB3
TotalN/A1.4 MB2.9 MB75

Third party requests and sizes per content type

22 requests
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b0 b0 b0
css0 b1.7 KB10.6 KB2
javascript0 b282.8 KB1011.2 KB7
image0 b0 b0 b0
font0 b71.0 KB71.0 KB2
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b260 B2 B1
json0 b11.0 KB44.4 KB7
svg0 b3.7 KB7.3 KB3
TotalN/A370.5 KB1.1 MB22

Lighthouse (version 13.0.1)